• Home  
  • Should THORChain’s Handling of Bybit Hack Funds Divide the Financial Industry?
- DeFi

Should THORChain’s Handling of Bybit Hack Funds Divide the Financial Industry?

THORChain, a decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol, recently found itself at the center of a controversy surrounding the processing of funds from the $1.4 billion Bybit hack. Despite having the ability to prevent the stolen ether from being transferred, THORChain processed almost 75% of the stolen funds, sparking a debate about the protocol’s adherence to cypherpunk […]

Should THORChain's Handling of Bybit Hack Funds Divide the Financial Industry?


THORChain, a decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol, recently found itself at the center of a controversy surrounding the processing of funds from the $1.4 billion Bybit hack. Despite having the ability to prevent the stolen ether from being transferred, THORChain processed almost 75% of the stolen funds, sparking a debate about the protocol’s adherence to cypherpunk values.

When it was discovered that the hackers from the Lazarus Group were exchanging their stolen ETH for bitcoins using THORChain, an immediate vote was held to halt the ETH to BTC swaps. However, this decision was quickly overturned by other voters, allowing the transactions to proceed.

According to THORChain Explorer, the protocol earned a staggering $5.5 million from facilitating the laundering of funds obtained by North Korean hackers. In a span of just 10 days, from February 22 to March 3, THORChain saw a total swap volume of $5.9 billion. Ultimately, the hackers successfully converted all of the nearly 500,000 stolen ether into bitcoin.

This incident has raised questions about whether THORChain should have taken a stronger stance against processing the funds from the Bybit hack. Critics argue that by allowing the stolen funds to flow through the protocol, THORChain is indirectly supporting criminal activities and undermining the principles of decentralization and trustlessness that DeFi aims to uphold.

On the other hand, proponents of THORChain’s decision argue that the protocol’s primary function is to facilitate swaps and provide liquidity, rather than act as a gatekeeper or arbiter of transactions. They believe that interfering with the flow of funds would set a dangerous precedent and potentially lead to censorship and control over the decentralized ecosystem.

While the debate continues, it is clear that incidents like the Bybit hack highlight the challenges and complexities faced by the DeFi space. As the industry grows and attracts more attention, it becomes increasingly important for protocols to strike a balance between maintaining the principles of decentralization and ensuring the security and integrity of the ecosystem.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

Wealth Radars  @2025. All Rights Reserved.